Skip to content

CFA Level I Derivatives Practice Questions

Questions on this page
6
Updated
Nov 3, 2026
Share of the exam
5-8%
  1. Question 1, hard

    A non-dividend-paying stock trades at $40. The 1-year risk-free rate is 6% (annually compounded), so the theoretical no-arbitrage 1-year forward price is $42.40. The forward is actually quoted in the market at $43.00. Which strategy would a trader use to capture a riskless arbitrage profit, and what is that profit closest to?

    • A.Borrow $40 to buy the stock now and simultaneously sell (go short) the forward contract. A cash-and-carry trade locking in about $0.60 of riskless profit
    • B.Short the stock now, invest the proceeds at the risk-free rate, and buy the forward contract (reverse cash-and-carry)
    • C.Do nothing, since the forward is fairly priced
    • D.Buy the forward contract and short the stock simultaneously, with no clear profit
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: A. Borrow $40 to buy the stock now and simultaneously sell (go short) the forward contract. A cash-and-carry trade locking in about $0.60 of riskless profit

    Since the market forward price ($43.00) exceeds the theoretical fair value ($42.40), the forward is overpriced relative to the underlying's cost of carry. The arbitrage is a cash-and-carry: borrow $40 today, buy the stock, and sell the forward at $43. At expiration, deliver the stock into the forward for $43 and repay the loan of $40 × 1.06 = $42.40, capturing a riskless $0.60 profit. Choice B (reverse cash-and-carry) is the correct strategy only when the forward is underpriced relative to fair value, not overpriced as here. Choice C ignores the clear mispricing. Choice D describes an incomplete, ambiguous strategy with no defined profit.

    • A. Correct. Since the forward is overpriced relative to fair value, the cash-and-carry trade (borrow to buy the stock, short the forward) locks in the $0.60 gap ($43.00 − $42.40) as riskless profit.
    • B. Incorrect. The reverse cash-and-carry (short stock, buy forward) is the correct strategy when the forward is underpriced, not overpriced as it is here.
    • C. Incorrect. The $0.60 gap between the market forward price and the no-arbitrage price means the forward is mispriced, so an arbitrage opportunity does exist.
    • D. Incorrect. Buying the forward while shorting the stock is the wrong-direction trade here; the correct arbitrage sells the overpriced forward while buying the stock for a clear, locked-in profit.
  2. Question 2, easy

    An investor holds a long call option with a strike price of $60. At expiration, the underlying stock is trading at $45. What is the payoff to the option holder at expiration, before considering the premium originally paid?

    • A.$0
    • B.$15
    • C.-$15
    • D.$60
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: A. $0

    A call option's payoff at expiration is max(0, S − K), where S is the stock price and K is the strike price. Here, S = $45 and K = $60, so S − K = −$15, and the payoff floor of zero applies: the holder simply lets the option expire worthless rather than exercising it to buy at $60 what's available in the market for $45. The payoff is $0, not a negative number, because the option holder is never obligated to exercise. B computes K − S, which is actually the put option payoff formula, not the call's. D incorrectly equates payoff with the strike price itself.

    • A. Correct. A call is only exercised if the stock price exceeds the strike; with the stock at $45 against a $60 strike, the call expires worthless, so the payoff is $0.
    • B. Incorrect. $15 would be the payoff only if the stock were trading $15 above the strike, not $15 below it.
    • C. Incorrect. Option payoffs before the premium can't be negative; the holder simply lets the option expire unexercised rather than exercising at a loss.
    • D. Incorrect. $60 is the strike price itself, not a payoff; the payoff is max(0, stock price − strike), which here equals $0.
  3. Question 3, medium

    A call option has a strike price of $40. The underlying stock currently trades at $45, and the call's market premium is $7. What is the time value (also called extrinsic value) of this option?

    • A.$2.00
    • B.$5.00
    • C.$7.00
    • D.$12.00
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: A. $2.00

    An option's premium is the sum of intrinsic value and time value. Intrinsic value for a call is max(0, S − K) = max(0, $45 − $40) = $5. Time value = Premium − Intrinsic value = $7 − $5 = $2.00. Choice B reports intrinsic value alone, mistaking it for time value. Choice C reports the full premium without separating out the intrinsic component. Choice D incorrectly adds the two components instead of subtracting.

    • A. Intrinsic value = max(0, $45-$40) = $5; time value = premium - intrinsic value = $7 - $5 = $2.00.
    • B. $5.00 is the option's intrinsic value, not its time value. The two must be subtracted from the premium to isolate the extrinsic component.
    • C. $7.00 is the full market premium, which combines both intrinsic and time value rather than isolating the extrinsic portion.
    • D. $12.00 incorrectly adds the premium and intrinsic value together instead of subtracting one from the other.
  4. Question 4, easy

    An investor owns a concentrated stock position with a six-month planned sale date. She wants to set a minimum net sale value while keeping upside, and accepts an option premium. Which strategy best fits?

    • A.Buy a put option on the stock with an appropriate strike and maturity.
    • B.Write an uncovered call option on a different stock, collecting premium that offsets part of any decline in the position.
    • C.Sell a put option on the stock, collecting premium that cushions a price decline while keeping the upside.
    • D.Short an equity index with imperfect correlation to the stock, without assessing the basis risk of the hedge.
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: A. Buy a put option on the stock with an appropriate strike and maturity.

    A protective put sets a floor near the strike, less premium and costs, while retaining upside. Selling a put adds downside exposure and an index short introduces basis risk.

    • A. The long put creates a minimum sale value and keeps the upside, at the cost of the premium.
    • B. An uncovered call on a different stock adds unlimited risk and does not protect the concentrated position.
    • C. A short put adds downside exposure and premium only partly cushions a decline; it sets no floor.
    • D. An imperfectly correlated index short leaves basis risk and does not set a minimum sale value while keeping upside.
  5. Question 5, medium

    An investor buys a stock at $40 and writes a call option on it with a $45 strike, receiving a $2 premium. What are the position's maximum profit per share at expiration and its breakeven stock price?

    • A.$5 and $42
    • B.$7 and $38
    • C.$7 and $42
    • D.Unlimited and $38
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: B. $7 and $38

    A covered call combines long stock and a short call. The maximum profit occurs at or above the strike: (45 - 40) + 2 premium = $7. The premium offsets losses, so the breakeven is the purchase price less the premium: 40 - 2 = $38.

    • A. This leaves the premium out of the maximum profit and adds it to the breakeven.
    • B. Correct: maximum profit $7, breakeven $38.
    • C. The maximum profit is right, but the premium lowers the breakeven rather than raising it.
    • D. Writing the call caps the upside at the strike, so profit is limited.
  6. Question 6, hard

    A non-dividend-paying stock currently trades at $100. European call and put options on the stock, both with a strike price of $100 and one year to expiration, are available. The annual risk-free rate is 5% (discretely compounded), and the call option currently trades for $8.00. Using put-call parity, what should the put option be worth?

    • A.$3.24
    • B.$8.00
    • C.$12.76
    • D.$4.76
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: A. $3.24

    Put-call parity for European options on a non-dividend-paying stock states: C + PV(K) = P + S, where PV(K) is the strike discounted at the risk-free rate. Here, PV(K) = $100 / 1.05 = $95.24. Solving for P: P = C + PV(K) − S = $8.00 + $95.24 − $100 = $3.24. Choice B incorrectly assumes call and put premiums must be equal, which is only coincidentally true when S = PV(K) (not the case here since the risk-free rate is positive). Choice D, $4.76, is the discount amount (S − PV(K)) itself, arrived at by dropping the call premium term from the equation. Choice C reflects a sign error in rearranging the parity equation.

    • A. Correctly applying put-call parity (P = C + PV(X) − S0 = 8 + 100/1.05 − 100) gives a put value of about $3.24, reflecting that the put must be cheaper than the call once the time value of money on the strike is properly discounted.
    • B. Setting the put equal to the call price ignores put-call parity entirely; the two would only be equal if the discounted strike exactly equaled the stock price, which isn't the case here since the risk-free rate is positive.
    • C. This value comes from adding the discounted-strike adjustment to the call price instead of subtracting it. A sign error in rearranging the parity equation that overstates the put's value.
    • D. This figure isolates the interest/carry adjustment term in the parity formula but stops short of combining it correctly with the call premium, so it understates the true put value rather than representing it.

Sources

Questions are drafted with help from AI and published only after a person reviews and approves them. How these questions are made

Keep going

The same subject on other exams

Already working in the field?

Learn about Parsonex