Skip to content

CFP Psychology of Financial Planning Practice Questions

Questions on this page
7
Updated
Nov 3, 2026
Share of the exam
7%
  1. Question 1, medium

    A retiree refuses to rebalance after an equity decline because selling any security below purchase price feels like admitting failure. Which intervention is most useful?

    • A.Assure the retiree that markets typically recover losses within about a year so waiting is reasonable
    • B.Reframe decisions around forward-looking risk, objectives and portfolio policy rather than anchored purchase prices
    • C.Stop sending account value reports so the retiree is not prompted to react to unrealized losses
    • D.Raise the equity allocation to improve the chance that the portfolio recovers to its purchase price
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: B. Reframe decisions around forward-looking risk, objectives and portfolio policy rather than anchored purchase prices

    Purchase price is an emotional anchor. Refocusing the decision on forward-looking risk, objectives and the portfolio's policy reduces the behavioral error and supports rebalancing.

    • A. Recovery timing cannot be predicted, and the assurance reinforces the anchor on purchase price.
    • B. Correct: a goals- and policy-based frame replaces the anchor on past cost.
    • C. Hiding values avoids the issue and prevents informed monitoring.
    • D. Raising equity exposure to chase recovery adds risk and keeps the decision tied to purchase price.
  2. Question 2, medium

    A client insists her home is worth $1.2 million because a neighbor's similar house sold for that amount five years ago, disregarding current comparable sales data suggesting a value closer to $950,000. This is a classic example of which bias?

    • A.Availability bias
    • B.Anchoring bias
    • C.Self-attribution bias
    • D.Mental accounting
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: B. Anchoring bias

    Anchoring bias occurs when a person fixates on an initial reference point (here, the old $1.2 million sale price) and fails to adjust sufficiently even when new, more relevant information becomes available. Availability bias instead involves overweighting information that is easily recalled or vivid, which is a related but distinct mental shortcut. Not the same as fixating on a specific numeric reference point.

    • A. Availability bias involves overweighting easily recalled or vivid examples generally; it doesn't specifically describe fixating on one particular past reference price.
    • B. Correct. Fixating on a specific past reference point (the neighbor's five-year-old sale price) while disregarding more current, relevant data is the classic definition of anchoring bias.
    • C. Self-attribution bias involves crediting personal skill for good outcomes, which isn't what's happening in this valuation dispute.
    • D. Mental accounting involves compartmentalizing money into separate purpose-based buckets, not anchoring on a past sale price.
  3. Question 3, hard

    In values-based financial planning and financial therapy, a 'financial flashpoint' refers to which of the following?

    • A.A pivotal past life event or experience. Such as growing up in poverty or witnessing a parent's bankruptcy. That shaped a client's deep-seated beliefs and emotional relationship with money
    • B.The moment a client's portfolio experiences a sudden, significant decline in value, prompting the client to reassess risk tolerance and rebalance holdings
    • C.The specific age at which a client becomes eligible for penalty-free retirement account withdrawals, such as age 59½, triggering a planning review of distribution options with the client's tax advisor and custodian
    • D.A compliance-triggering event, such as a material change in a client's circumstances, that requires the planner to deliver a mandatory written disclosure to the client
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: A. A pivotal past life event or experience. Such as growing up in poverty or witnessing a parent's bankruptcy. That shaped a client's deep-seated beliefs and emotional relationship with money

    A financial flashpoint is a formative past experience. Often from childhood or a major life transition. That shapes a person's underlying money scripts and emotional relationship with money going forward. Identifying these flashpoints in client conversations helps planners understand the 'why' behind persistent financial behaviors, distinct from market events, regulatory ages, or compliance triggers.

    • A. Correct. A financial flashpoint is a pivotal past experience, such as growing up in poverty or witnessing a parent's bankruptcy, that shapes a client's core beliefs and emotional relationship with money.
    • B. Wrong. A portfolio decline is a market event; a financial flashpoint is a formative past experience that shaped the client's beliefs about money, not a recent market drop.
    • C. Wrong. An age-based withdrawal eligibility rule, even one prompting a review with the tax advisor and custodian, is a technical planning fact unrelated to the psychological concept of a flashpoint.
    • D. Wrong. A compliance disclosure trigger is a regulatory concept, not a personal formative experience that shapes money beliefs.
  4. Question 4, hard

    In a first meeting, a husband describes himself as aggressive while his wife says she is conservative; they share one investment portfolio. What should the planner do?

    • A.Average their two risk scores and implement the resulting allocation without any further discussion between them.
    • B.Adopt the husband's view, since he describes the higher risk tolerance and growth is needed for long-term goals.
    • C.Adopt the more conservative view and skip discussion to avoid conflict at the meeting.
    • D.Assess each spouse's risk tolerance separately, then facilitate a discussion to reach a shared approach.
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: D. Assess each spouse's risk tolerance separately, then facilitate a discussion to reach a shared approach.

    When partners hold different risk preferences, the planner should assess each separately and then facilitate a shared decision. This respects both clients and documents the basis for the policy.

    • A. Averaging hides disagreement and may fit neither spouse.
    • B. Defaulting to one partner ignores the other client's preferences.
    • C. Choosing for them ignores the process of reaching a joint decision.
    • D. Independent assessment surfaces true views before they are influenced by the partner, and discussion resolves differences.
  5. Question 5, easy

    A client consistently avoids checking his account balances, feels guilty about having money, and gives funds away impulsively, believing 'people who have a lot of money are greedy.' Using Klontz's money script framework, this pattern is most consistent with which category?

    • A.Money worship
    • B.Money status
    • C.Money vigilance
    • D.Money avoidance
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: D. Money avoidance

    Money avoidance scripts involve beliefs that money is bad, that wealthy people are undeserving or greedy, and behaviors like avoiding financial information, self-sabotaging financial success, or impulsively giving money away out of guilt. Money worship (belief money brings happiness), money vigilance (careful, watchful saving), and money status (linking net worth to self-worth) describe different patterns.

    • A. Money worship associates money with solving problems or achieving happiness; it doesn't fit the guilt-driven avoidance and impulsive giving described here.
    • B. Money status ties self-worth to wealth and possessions, which contradicts the guilt about having money described here.
    • C. Money vigilance involves careful monitoring, saving, and frugality. The opposite of avoidance and impulsive giving.
    • D. Correct. Avoiding account balances, feeling guilty about having money, and believing wealthy people are 'greedy' are hallmark traits of the money avoidance script.
  6. Question 6, hard

    A client says he is comfortable with large swings and wants an all-equity portfolio, but he must pay $200,000 for a home purchase in two years from this same account. How should the planner treat the mismatch?

    • A.Follow the stated tolerance, because the client's willingness to take risk is the controlling factor in setting allocation.
    • B.Recognize that limited risk capacity for the near-term goal should constrain the allocation despite high stated tolerance.
    • C.Adopt an all-bond allocation for the entire account because any equity exposure is inappropriate.
    • D.Ask him to retake the risk questionnaire with revised wording until the results line up with his stated goal.
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: B. Recognize that limited risk capacity for the near-term goal should constrain the allocation despite high stated tolerance.

    Risk tolerance is willingness, while risk capacity is financial ability to bear losses. When a short horizon limits capacity for a specific goal, the planner should size that portion conservatively even if stated tolerance is high.

    • A. Willingness does not control when the ability to bear loss is limited.
    • B. Risk capacity reflects the ability to absorb losses given goals and time horizon; it can override willingness.
    • C. Capacity applies to the near-term goal; longer-term funds may still carry growth assets.
    • D. Repeating a questionnaire to manufacture a result does not address the capacity issue.
  7. Question 7, easy

    A client insists his stock-picking skill will consistently beat the market over the long run, despite historical data showing most active traders underperform a benchmark index after costs. This attitude best reflects:

    • A.Loss aversion
    • B.Overconfidence bias
    • C.Mental accounting
    • D.Framing effect
    Show answer and explanationHide answer

    Correct answer: B. Overconfidence bias

    Overconfidence bias is the tendency to overestimate one's own abilities or judgments. A well-documented driver of excessive trading and under-diversification, since research shows active traders systematically underperform passive benchmarks after costs.

    • A. Wrong. Loss aversion concerns feeling losses more intensely than equivalent gains, not overestimating one's own market-beating ability.
    • B. Correct. Believing his own skill will consistently beat the market despite contrary evidence about active-trader underperformance is a classic expression of overconfidence bias.
    • C. Wrong. Mental accounting involves treating money differently based on its mental category or source, unrelated to this belief in stock-picking skill.
    • D. Wrong. The framing effect concerns how choices are presented influencing decisions, not a persistent belief in outperforming the market.

Questions are drafted with help from AI and published only after a person reviews and approves them. How these questions are made

More Psychology of Financial Planning questions

Keep going

Already working in the field?

Learn about Parsonex